February 28, 1884
-
-
- January 3, 1884
- January 10, 1884
- January 31, 1884
- February 28, 1884
- March 13, 1884
- March 20, 1884
- March 27, 1884
- April 3, 1884
- May 1, 1884
- May 8, 1884
- May 22, 1884
- May 29, 1884
- June 5, 1884
- June 12, 1884
- June 19, 1884
- June 26, 1884
- July 3, 1884
- July 17, 1884
- July 24, 1884
- July 31, 1884
- August 7, 1884
- August 14, 1884
- August 21, 1884
- August 28, 1884
- September 4, 1884
- September 11, 1884
- September 18, 1884
- October 2, 1884
- October 9, 1884
- October 16, 1884
- October 23, 1884
- October 30, 1884
- November 6, 1884
- November 13, 1884
- November 20, 1884
- November 27, 1884
- December 4, 1884
- December 11, 1884
- December 18, 1884
-
Search Results
- Results
- Related
- Featured
- Weighted Relevancy
- Content Sequence
- Relevancy
- Earliest First
- Latest First
- Exact Match First, Root Words Second
- Exact word match
- Root word match
- EGW Collections
- All collections
- Lifetime Works (1845-1917)
- Compilations (1918-present)
- Adventist Pioneer Library
- My Bible
- Dictionary
- Reference
- Short
- Long
- Paragraph
No results.
EGW Extras
Directory
February 28, 1884
“A Humiliating Confession” The Signs of the Times, 10, 9.
In a recent number of the Christian Statesman, a lecturer for the “National Reform” party, tells of the extreme wickedness of St. Louis, and of the difficulty which the pastors experience in getting even the members of their own churches to attend regular services. The condition of affairs is truly distressing, but as we read in the same article a portion of a conversation with one of the pastors of the city, we could not feel that the fault lay primarily with the lay members.SITI February 28, 1884, page 137.1
It seems that the Ministers’ Association of the city declined to accept an invitation from the Women’s Christian Temperance Union to preach on the subject of prohibition. As an excuse for their course, one of the ministers said:-SITI February 28, 1884, page 137.2
“Don’t be discouraged because we do not work with you in this reform. Our hearts are with you. It does not require a majority now to turn off a minister. One or two can do it, if they have money. It is unsafe for us to take a higher standard than the lowest in our congregations, for the people say we must be a unit, or the pastor must go. We are like men pulling a sled on slippery ice. We have to be careful or our feet will fly.”SITI February 28, 1884, page 137.3
How much self-respect can such a man have? How dare not preach that which will displease his hearers. It is safe to say that in every congregation there are some whose taste are exceedingly low and depraved-who attend church and wear the cloak of religion in order to conceal some of their evil deeds; and yet the pastors say, “It is unsafe for us to take a higher standard than the lowest in our congregations.” Is it any wonder that the people are not elevated? When ministers of the gospel deliberately pawn their honor for their salary, is it surprising that the people sell their souls for lust and lucre?SITI February 28, 1884, page 137.4
Perhaps some of our friends would accuse us of lack of charity if we should say that the course which those pastors pursue is in exact fulfillment of Isaiah 56:10, 11, but we ask them to read the text, and see if it is not at least a parallel; and then we ask them to decide whether or not it is safe to unhesitatingly accept the first day of the week as the Sabbath, simply because the popular ministers say that it is. Is it not time for the people to search the Scriptures for themselves, to ascertain if these things are so? If such a course was commendable in Paul’s day, and under his preaching, is it not imperatively necessary now? E. J. W.SITI February 28, 1884, page 137.5