70. Page 327
- Introduction
- Chapter 1—The Documented Facts in the Case
- Chapter 2—History of the 1911 Edition
-
- 1. Page 22
- 2. Page 24
- 3. Page 26
- 4. Page 28
- 5. Page 31
- 6. Page 33
- 7. Page 43
- 8. Page 50
- 9. Page 52
- 10. Page 52
- 11. Page 52
- 12. Page 54
- 13. Page 56
- 14. Page 57
- 15. Page 59
- 16. Page 59
- 17. Page 59
- 18. Page 60
- 19. Page 60
- 20. Page 61
- 21. Page 61
- 22. Page 62
- 23. Page 63
- 24. Page 64
- 25. Page 65
- 26. Page 65
- 27. Page 76
- 28. Page 77
- 29. Page 79
- 30. Page 82
- 31. Page 84
- 32. Page 85
- 33. Page 85
- 34. Page 86
- 35. Page 88
- 36. Page 97
- 37. Page 103
- 38. Page 104
- 39. Page 106
- 40. Page 107
- 41. Page 116
- 42. Page 122
- 43. Page 128
- 44. Page 129
- 45. Page 160
- 46. Pages 202 and 203
- 47. Page 209
- 48. Page 234
- 49. Page 235
- 50. Page 261
- 51. Page 266
- 52. Page 266
- 53. Page 267
- 54. Page 268
- 55. Page 269
- 56. Page 271
- 57. Page 272
- 57a. Page 272
- 57b. Page 272
- 58: Page 273
- 59. Page 276
- 59a. Page 276
- 60. Page 277
- 61. Page 282
- 62. Page 284
- 63. Page 285
- 64. Page 288
- 65. Page 292
- 66. Page 306
- 67. Page 304
- 68. Page 325
- 69. Page 326
- 70. Page 327
- 71. Page 334
- 72. Page 334
- 73. Page 334
- 74. Page 340
- 75. Page 356
- 76. Page 368
- 77. Page 376
- 78. Page 380
- 79. Page 381
- 80. Page 410
- 81. Pages 412, 413
- 82. Page 413
- 83. Page 415
- 84. Page 438
- 85. Page 439
- 86. Page 440
- 87. Page 447
- 88. Page 453
- 89. Page 457
- 90. Page 524
- 91. Page 549
- 92. Page 557
- 93. Page 563
- 94. Page 565
- 95. Pages 567 and 569
- 96. Page 575
- 97. Page 57
- 97a. Page 577
- 97b. Page 57
- 98. Page 579
- 99. Page 580
- 100. Page 587
- 101. Page 681
- 102. Page 685
- 103. Page 686
- 104. Page 690
- 105. General Observation
- 106. General Criticism
- Chapter 4—C. C. Crisler’s Expressions Of Approval And Satisfaction With The 1888 Edition Of The Great Controversy
- Chapter 5—A Postscript—An Observation On W. W. Prescott’s Use Of The Writings Of Others
Search Results
- Results
- Related
- Featured
- Weighted Relevancy
- Content Sequence
- Relevancy
- Earliest First
- Latest First
- Exact Match First, Root Words Second
- Exact word match
- Root word match
- EGW Collections
- All collections
- Lifetime Works (1845-1917)
- Compilations (1918-present)
- Adventist Pioneer Library
- My Bible
- Dictionary
- Reference
- Short
- Long
- Paragraph
No results.
EGW Extras
Directory
70. Page 327
In dealing with the decree of Artaxerxes, it is stated that it “went into effect in the autumn of B.C. 457.”WWPGC 26.8
On the basis of this interpretation the 483 years are made to extend to the autumn of A.D. 27, when, it is stated on the same page, that: “Christ was baptized by John.”WWPGC 26.9
Further interpreting “the midst of the week” to mean the middle of the week, it is stated, on the same page, that: “In A. D. 31, three and a half years after His baptism, our Lord was crucified.”WWPGC 26.10
The same method of beginning the 2300 days in the autumn of B. C. 457 is used in the argument on pages 398, 400, and 410; and the time of the baptism is definitely fixed as the autumn of A. D. 27, and the crucifixion as the spring of A.D. 31. No proof is given, except the claim that the 2300 years commenced in the autumn of B.C. 457. But the Scripture statement is very plain; it says: “Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem unto Messiah the Prince, shall be seven weeks, and three score and two weeks,” et cetera.WWPGC 26.11
It is very difficult for me to see how the expression “From the going forth of the commandment,” can be made to mean from the time that Ezra commenced to build the city, at least six months after the commandment went forth.WWPGC 26.12
Furthermore, in my investigation of this subject, I find much good argument for placing the baptism in 27, either the spring or the summer of 27; and for placing the crucifixion either in A.D. 29 or 30; but I find no authority for making it as late as 31, except the marginal chronology of the Authorized Version of the Bible, which is Usher’s chronology. This chronology has been accepted by our writers to establish the baptism in A.D. 27, but has been rejected so far as it relates to the crucifixion, which is placed by it in A.D. 33.WWPGC 27.1
It seems to me abundantly evident from the Scripture and history that the 2300 days commenced in the spring of B.C. 457; that the baptism was not later than the early part of A.D. 27; that the crucifixion was not later than the early part of A.D. 30; and that the 2300 days must end in the spring of 1844. This interpretation appears to me to be in harmony both with Scripture and history.WWPGC 27.2
And this was the original interpretation of William Miller, as stated on page 328: “Miller and his associates at first believed that the 2300 days would terminate in the spring of 1844 whereas the prophecy points to the autumn of that year.”WWPGC 27.3
I am unable to see that the prophecy does point to the autumn of that year. The diagram inserted between pages 328 and 329 places the crucifixion in A.D. 31, the setting up of the papacy in 538, the ending of the 1260 years in 1798, and the ending of the 2300 years in the autumn of 1844.WWPGC 27.4
Response: Negative. No change made in the text.WWPGC 27.5
Observation: W. C. White in describing Ellen White’s work and its relation to the visions declared: “The framework of the great temple of truth sustained by her writings was presented to her clearly in vision. In some features of this work, information was given in detail. Regarding some features of the revelation, such as the features of prophetic chronology, as regards the ministration in the sanctuary and the changes that took place in 1844, the matter was presented to her many times and in detail many times, and this enabled her to speak clearly and very positively regarding the foundation pillars of our faith.”—W. C. White to L. E. Froom, January 8, 1928 (Published in Selected Messages 3:462).WWPGC 27.6