Argument by Prof. W. W. Prescott
- Argument by Prof. W. W. Prescott
- Class Legislation
- History of the Bill
- The Next Step
- Only Upon Religious Grounds
- “Innocent Beginnings”
- Not a Mere Theory
- How Public Worship Should be Protected
- Argument by Prof. A. T. Jones
- Character of Sunday Legislation
- Revolution Backwards
- How Religious Liberty was Established in the United States
- The Flag and Patriotism
- Do Sunday Laws Preserve a Nation?
- What Is the Equivalent?
- Religion a Necessity
- The Inevitable Result
-
Search Results
- Results
- Related
- Featured
- Weighted Relevancy
- Content Sequence
- Relevancy
- Earliest First
- Latest First
- Exact Match First, Root Words Second
- Exact word match
- Root word match
- EGW Collections
- All collections
- Lifetime Works (1845-1917)
- Compilations (1918-present)
- Adventist Pioneer Library
- My Bible
- Dictionary
- Reference
- Short
- Long
- Paragraph
No results.
EGW Extras
Directory
Argument by Prof. W. W. Prescott
MR. CHAIRMAN, GENTLEMEN OF THE COMMITTEE: It seems proper that we should have a clear understanding of the real point at issue between us in speaking for and against this measure. Those who are opposed to this bill are not opposed to any man having one day of rest whenever he wishes to take it. They are not in favor of slavery either for working men or for those who are recognized as bondmen. The real question at issue is this: Is it incumbent upon the legislative body to compel men to rest? I submit that as the real question at issue.RJSB 3.1
We take no issue with what these gentlemen say as to the desirability of rest; we take no issue with them on the question from a physiological standpoint. It is just as important that men should sleep regularly as that they should rest a certain portion of time. And with the same logic they use in asking you to pass a bill to compel men to rest, they can come next time and ask you to pass a bill compelling men to sleep. They rest upon the same basis, gentlemen.RJSB 3.2