Loading...
Larger font
Smaller font
Copy
Print
Contents
  • Results
  • Related
  • Featured
No results found for: "".
  • Weighted Relevancy
  • Content Sequence
  • Relevancy
  • Earliest First
  • Latest First
    Larger font
    Smaller font
    Copy
    Print
    Contents

    POPULAR THEORIES

    We see, then, that there is no chance to establish the doctrine of a Paradise in hades from Bible testimony, or to show from the Bible that dead men are conscious. It is true that poets have sung:HPGO 61.1

    “There is no death, what seems so is transition.
    This life of mortal breath
    Is but a suburb of the life elysian,
    Whose portals we call death.”
    HPGO 61.2

    Great men have built beautiful theories of fancy relative to it, but God’s word is very clear and plain. I will give one sample of philosophizing on the matter from Benjamin Franklin’s letter to Miss Hubbard on the death of his brother, Mr. John Franklin. “MADAM: I condole with you. We have lost a most dear and valuable relation. But it is the will of God and nature that these mortal bodies be laid aside when the soul is to enter into real life. This is rather an embryo state, a preparation for living. A man is not completely born till he be dead. Why then should we grieve that a new child is born among the immortals, a new member added to their happy society? We are spirits. That bodies should be lent us, while they can afford us pleasure, assist us in acquiring knowledge, or in doing good to our fellow-creatures, is a kind and benevolent act of God. When they become unfit for these purposes, and afford us pain instead of pleasure, instead of an aid become an incumbrance, and answer none of the intentions for which they were given, it is equally kind and benevolent that a way is provided in which we may get rid of them. Death is that way. We ourselves, in some cases, prudently choose a partial death. A mangled, painful limb, which cannot be restored, we willingly cut off. He who plucks out a tooth, parts with it freely, since the pain goes with it; and he who quits the whole body, parts at once with all pains, and possibilities of pains, and diseases, it is liable to, or capable of making him suffer.HPGO 61.3

    “Our friend and we were invited abroad on a party of pleasure which is to last forever. His chair was ready first, and he is gone before us. We could not all conveniently start together; and why should we be grieved at this since we are so soon to follow and know where to find him?”HPGO 62.1

    This talk of the philosopher Franklin of course was in harmony with the theology he had been taught. He well expresses the popular sentiment of this time, but he presents no proof of it above; it is mere assertion, and these assertions are in direct opposition to the teachings of the Bible, which present death as a foe instead of a friend, and declare that, without the resurrection, the dead are lost.HPGO 62.2

    The contrast between Bible doctrine and the theology of the present time, on this subject, is great. We read, “The first-born of death shall devour his strength. His confidence shall be rooted out of his tabernacle, and it shall bring him to the king of terrors.” Job 18:13, 14. Here, death is called the “king of terrors.” Again he says: “Oh! that I had given up the ghost, and no eye had seen me! I should have been as though I had not been; I should have been carried from the womb to the grave. Are not my days few? cease, then, and let me alone, that I may take comfort a little, before I go whence I shall not return, even to the land of darkness, and the shadow of death: a land of darkness, as darkness itself, and of the shadow of death, without any order, and where the light is as darkness.” Job 10:18-22. Compare this with a little modern theology and you will see the contrast. “Death, to a man whose mind is healthy, is a pleasant prospect. He does not regard it as death at all. A man who believes that he will ever be buried must have very unpleasant feelings. For our part, we believe it is impossible to bury any man; that no grave or coffin will ever contain him; and that no undertaker is able to seize him when he leaves his earthly tenement. Buried! what a horrid idea! We pity the man who thinks he ever will or can be buried. We know by experience in childhood and youth what it is to fear it; but now we know that the grave is no concern of ours, and has no dominion over us. Truly death is a good thing.”HPGO 62.3

    See what a different sentiment is penned by Isaiah: “Thy dead men shall live, together with my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust; for thy dew is as the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast out the dead.” Isaiah 26:19. See what he calls death in the previous chapter: “And he will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all people, and the vail that is spread over all nations.” What is this covering and vail? The next words tell us: “He will swallow up death in victory.” Isaiah 25:7, 8.HPGO 63.1

    The reason of the above contrast is this: Bible writers saw no hope, only in the resurrection of the dead, while modern writers claim that man is possessed of an entity which they call soul or spirit, which they say is capable of a conscious existence separate from the body. This part they claim is immortal. Does the Bible tell us anywhere that man has an immortal soul or spirit? It does not. The terms soul and spirit occur in the Bible many hundred times, but in not one single instance are they said to be immortal or deathless.HPGO 63.2

    Larger font
    Smaller font
    Copy
    Print
    Contents