A SHORT ARGUMENT FOR THE SABBATH
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- THE SABBATH
- WHAT IS THE LAW?
- THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT
- ORIGIN OF THE SABBATH
- THE SABBATH WAS NOT JEWISH
- THE SEVENTH DAY IS THE SABBATH OF THE LORD THY GOD
- THE SABBATH WAS NOT A TYPE
- OUR SAVIOUR DID NOT CHANGE THE SABBATH
- THE SAVIOUR KEPT THE SABBATH
- THE APOSTLES KEPT THE SABBATH
- THE EARLY CHURCH KEPT THE SABBATH
- THE WALDENSES KEPT THE SABBATH
- SUNDAY-KEEPING A HUMAN ORDINANCE
- CLAIMS OF THE SEVENTH DAY AND FIRST DAY COMPARED
- THE LAW AND THE GOSPEL AGREE
- THE LAST DAYS
- A SHORT ARGUMENT FOR THE SABBATH
- I. WHAT DOES GOD’S WORD TEACH CONCERNING THE SABBATH?
- II. WHAT DOES THE NEW TESTAMENT TEACH CONCERNING THE FIRST DAY OF THE WEEK?
Search Results
- Results
- Related
- Featured
- Weighted Relevancy
- Content Sequence
- Relevancy
- Earliest First
- Latest First
- Exact Match First, Root Words Second
- Exact word match
- Root word match
- EGW Collections
- All collections
- Lifetime Works (1845-1917)
- Compilations (1918-present)
- Adventist Pioneer Library
- My Bible
- Dictionary
- Reference
- Short
- Long
- Paragraph
No results.
EGW Extras
Directory
A SHORT ARGUMENT FOR THE SABBATH
It has often been asserted that the truth is hard to find; that almost all things are matters of uncertainty, inasmuch as men equally honest, intelligent, and learned, will arrive at different conclusions from an examination of the same facts. But it is not so. That learned men do come to different conclusions on the same subjects will not be denied; but that they are equally honest and unprejudiced in their investigations cannot be believed. Ten men, or ten thousand men, must come to the same conclusion if they reason legitimately, and from established, or evident, truths. To suppose otherwise, is to suppose that opposite conclusions can be legitimately drawn from the same truth, which is absurd. It is only when they range the fields of fancy, and seek to gratify inclination, or sustain certain prepossessions rather than to conform to reason, that they arrive at different conclusions. Otherwise the search for truth would be but a chase after an ignis-fatuus, not to be attained, nor worth attaining.TFNOS 43.2
GOD’S WORD IS TRUTH. There is nothing equivalent to it—nothing can be taken as a substitute for it. Firmly relying on it, I propose to examine its teachings on the subject of the Sabbath. This is a subject of great importance and of growing interest; and whenever plain statements of the word are adduced, I call upon all Bible believers to acknowledge their authority, and to assent to all necessary conclusions drawn therefrom. I shall then show, by an examination of opposing views, whence arises the confusion and diversity of opinion, so much deprecated in words, yet so upheld in practice, by the majority.TFNOS 43.3
I shall examine the subject under the following heads:—TFNOS 44.1
I. WHAT GOD’S WORD TEACHES CONCERNING THE SABBATH.
II. WHAT THE NEW TESTAMENT TEACHES CONCERNING THE FIRST DAY OF THE WEEK.
III. THE OPINIONS OF LEARNED MEN ON THE SUBJECT.
I shall lay down one rule of evidence, which I shall strictly follow; and, from its reasonableness, I shall expect all to acquiesce in it, and abide by it, in examining these remarks, namely:—TFNOS 44.2
Admit facts as proof against facts, and let inferences stand against inferences; but no plain truth can be overthrown by an inference. This must be allowed, unless the position be taken that the less disproves the greater, which, of course, cannot be.TFNOS 44.3
Respecting inferences, I adopt the following from Dr. A. Carson, namely:—TFNOS 44.4