Loading...
Larger font
Smaller font
Copy
Print
Contents
The Gift of Prophecy - Contents
  • Results
  • Related
  • Featured
No results found for: "".
  • Weighted Relevancy
  • Content Sequence
  • Relevancy
  • Earliest First
  • Latest First
    Larger font
    Smaller font
    Copy
    Print
    Contents

    Chapter 4 — The Use of Scripture by Bible Writers

    Clinton Wahlen

    Studying the use of Scripture by Bible writers involves broader hermeneutical issues such as the nature of inspiration, the relationship between the testaments, the role of Israel in prophecy and prophetic fulfillment in general, and whether inspired writers had access to hermeneutical tools inaccessible to other interpreters, including modern readers. 1As used here, “Scripture” refers to the 66 canonical books accepted by Protestants. Evangelical interpreters, to say nothing of their more liberal counterparts, hold widely different positions on all of these issues. 2See the summaries in Darrell L. Bock, “Evangelicals and the Use of the Old Testament in the New. Part 1,” Bibliotheca Sacra 142 (July-September 1985): 209-223; and Robert L. Thomas, “The New Testament Use of the Old Testament,” Master’s Seminary Journal 13, no. 1 (Spring 2002): 88-98. See also Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., Darrell L. Bock, and Peter Enns, Three Views on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008) and especially the very useful prolegomenon by Jonathan Lunde, “An Introduction to Central Questions in the New Testament Use of the Old Testament,” 7-41. Fortunately, there remains substantial agreement among many Seventh-day Adventist interpreters on some of the most important hermeneutical issues. 3Richard M. Davidson, “Biblical Interpretation,” in Handbook of Seventh-day Adventist Theology, Commentary Reference Series 12 (Hagerstown, Md.: Review and Herald®, 2000), 58-104. See also idem, “New Testament Use of the Old Testament,” Journal of the Adventist Theological Society 5, no. 1 (1994): 14-39. The most pertinent of these principles for our purposes is the recognition that “the Bible is its own best interpreter and when studied as a whole it depicts a consistent, harmonious truth (2 Tim. 3:16; Heb. 1:1, 2; cf. Selected Messages, 1:19, 20; The Great Controversy, v, vi).” 4“Methods of Bible Study,” 2.a(3), a document endorsed by the General Conference Executive Committee at the Annual Council, October 12, 1986. See Adventist Review, Jan. 22, 1987, 18-20.GOP 105.1

    Since the Bible is its own best interpreter, it is important for us to observe how that process takes place. How do the Bible writers interpret the writings of their predecessors? Many answers have been given to this question and most of them are neither helpful nor faithful to the biblical text. For example, it is not accurate to say that the Bible writers, when quoting Scripture, sometimes impose a meaning on the text that is foreign to the author’s original intention; or that they used methods of interpretation that came to be used only well after the final books of the New Testament were written, such as pesher exegesis, homiletical midrash, or an allegorical method. Such ideas have only clouded study of this topic. While we cannot in this brief study address all of the various issues involved, careful attention to how both Old and New Testament authors approached and interpreted Scripture can provide us with several important keys for interpretation of their writings.GOP 105.2

    Larger font
    Smaller font
    Copy
    Print
    Contents