Counsel #9 — Hard Sayings: Astronomical Statements

Picture: Counsel #9 — Hard Sayings: Astronomical StatementsCCW 161.1

Critics point to Ellen White's statements about astronomy as scientific errors. However, prophets aren't expected to be science experts! Literal interpretations of some biblical language (like "four corners of the earth"^{[239]Isaiah 11:12}) wouldn't hold up either.CCW 161.2

A specific claim is that White said the moon and stars shine by reflected sunlight, proving a lack of scientific knowledge.^{[240]https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/13960.208#208} However, this is seen as a simplified explanation for lay people.CCW 161.3

Another criticism concerns White describing a world with seven moons, supposedly Jupiter or Saturn. But White never named the planets. It's argued that the vision's details, matching sea captain Joseph Bates’ knowledge of astronomy in 1846, convinced him of White's gift. If she'd described what modern telescopes reveal, it wouldn't have been believable in that era. The vision's purpose may have been to strengthen Bates’ faith in Ellen White’s prophetic calling, not provide a scientific update.^{[241]https://whiteestate.org/legacy/issues-herm-pri-html/#prove}CCW 161.4

“He laid the earth upon its foundations: it shall not be removed forever.” Psalms 104:5 DARBYCCW 161.5

“In the future, these books [Ellen White’s writings] are to make the gospel plain to many others, revealing to them the way of salvation.” Ellen White in Letters and Manuscripts, vol. 17, Letter 196, 1902, par. 4CCW 161.6

Reflect: When reading the writings of Ellen White, how can you distinguish between the core message (e.g., how to know Jesus and find salvation through Him) and incidental details (e.g., number of moons on a planet)?CCW 161.7